From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 25 14:17:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA12563 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 14:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etinc.com (et-gw-fr1.etinc.com [204.141.244.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA12533 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 14:17:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ntws (ntws.etinc.com [204.141.95.142]) by etinc.com (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA08957; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 17:23:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970425171552.00afddd0@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 17:15:54 -0400 To: Paul Traina From: dennis Subject: Re: Router statistics Cc: dg@root.com, hackers@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 04:07 PM 4/24/97 -0700, you wrote: >dg@root.com (David Greenman) writes: > >> >At 12:17 PM 4/24/97 -0400, Christopher Sedore wrote: >> Wcarchive does an average of 3500 pps with a peak of around 5000 pps. The >> average data rate is around 20-25Mbps, with the machine around 50% idle. This >> is using the Intel PCI Pro/100B...reduce the idle time to about 30% if you're >> using a DEC/de card. > >Yep, the fxp driver is /much/ more efficient than the de driver. Oh well, >fxp's are cheaper too. :-) Perhaps, but they arent cheapter than the DEC clones (under $80.). Are there intel clones? Dennis > >