Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 12:39:04 -0500 From: "Michael W. Lucas" <mwlucas@michaelwlucas.com> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update hang on 10.0-BETA2->BETA4 upgrade Message-ID: <20131203173904.GA45422@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> In-Reply-To: <20131203173143.GQ85910@glenbarber.us> References: <20131203151440.GA44732@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20131203152132.GN85910@glenbarber.us> <20131203172235.GA45315@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20131203173143.GQ85910@glenbarber.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:31:43PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:22:35PM -0500, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > And it hangs. > > > > > What is shown when you hit ^T when it hangs? > > > > load: 0.17 cmd: install 2796 [nanslp] 156.82r 0.01u 0.02s 0% 6220k > > > > If you keep hitting ^T, does the install(1) PID change? > > > Any thoughts? > > > > This is a new system, so I could reinstall it if need be, but it > > seemed that troubleshooting might be valuable. If I should just > > reinstall with beta4, please say so. > > > > This is not a scalable solution. :) > > It is a pretty large update, so I would not be surprised if it does take > a bit longer than normally expected. Either way, I'm getting a VM set > up now to see what happens. I sit corrected. It did finish. But yes, it took much longer than the "freebsd-update fetch" output led me to expect. Sounds like I need to write a blog post about this. ==ml -- Michael W. Lucas - mwlucas@michaelwlucas.com, Twitter @mwlauthor http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/ Absolute OpenBSD 2/e - http://www.nostarch.com/openbsd2e coupon code "ILUVMICHAEL" gets you 30% off & helps me.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131203173904.GA45422>