From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 14:50:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE3C16A41C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:50:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A9F43D53 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:50:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927A122241D for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:50:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24167-07 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:50:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D241222405 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:50:05 -0500 (CDT) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:49:51 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <0a6397740f09ea4ac7cce0b1bead3bde@chrononomicon.com> <20050601143415.D69453@wolf.pjkh.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1238507.DBk4vHqfeO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506020949.54925.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: postgrey question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:50:09 -0000 --nextPart1238507.DBk4vHqfeO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 02 June 2005 06:54, Bart Silverstrim wrote: > If people keep accepting broken implementation as the status quo, we're > going to keep getting people who leave broken implementations in place. I have to agree with you on that one. Greylisting is no more non-standard= =20 than saying "I'm kind of having problems right now; please try again=20 later". If a machine breaks on greylisting, then any number of other=20 unintentional problems with also break it. On the positive side, so many=20 servers are adopting greylisting that I suspect servers that can't handle=20 it will get fixed rather quickly. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1238507.DBk4vHqfeO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBCnxyS5sRg+Y0CpvERAi4iAJ93iGTFSixIMvOfvm1s8lGUpfitpACfVMG5 +UhJVNlF9sX+UiLyasF8y74= =7+H1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1238507.DBk4vHqfeO--