From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Aug 24 18:51:41 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id SAA15581
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 18:51:41 -0700
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA15572
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 18:51:37 -0700
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA11774; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 18:51:24 -0700
Message-Id: <199508250151.SAA11774@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: "Don's FList drop" <freelist@elf.kendall.mdcc.edu>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: GOOD and W/O extras ISDN modem - advice needed. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Aug 1995 17:57:43 EDT."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.950824175638.7077B-100000@elf.kendall.mdcc.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 1995 18:51:23 -0700
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>>> "Don's FList drop" said:
 > 
 > On Thu, 24 Aug 1995, Joe Greco wrote:
 > 
 > > this in some fashion.  You cannot do 128K on an async link because 128K
 > > isn't a standard RS232 speed.  Your next choice would probably be 230.4K,
 > > but I haven't seen any terminal adaptors that support this speed, and you
 > > need a special serial port to handle it.  Anyways, in conclusion: An ISDN 
     TA
 > > does not deal with analog information in any way.
 > 
 > Aren't there a few ISDN adaptors out there with parallel and ethernet 
 > interfaces to deal with this speed problem?
 > 

Yeap, my Ascend Pipeline 50 has an ethernet interface which translates
to less overhead on my system and I do get 128kb when I need it .

	Amancio