From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 8 23:00:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC74106566B for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 23:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77E68FC1A for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 23:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p28N0IRq084551 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 23:00:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p28N0IeU084550; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 23:00:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 23:00:18 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <201103082300.p28N0IeU084550@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Lena Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69887106564A for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 22:58:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from red.freebsd.org (red.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592348FC15 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 22:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from red.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by red.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p28MwnYq026412 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 22:58:49 GMT (envelope-from nobody@red.freebsd.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by red.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p28Mwn4M026411; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 22:58:49 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <201103082258.p28Mwn4M026411@red.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 22:58:49 GMT From: Lena To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.1 Cc: Subject: misc/155385: geli manual X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 23:00:19 -0000 >Number: 155385 >Category: misc >Synopsis: geli manual >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: doc-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Tue Mar 08 23:00:18 UTC 2011 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Lena >Release: 8.2 release >Organization: CSOA La Talaia >Environment: any >Description: There is a phrase in geli man pages that I would classify as sexist: "Create an encrypted provider, but use two keys: one for your girlfriend and one for you (so there will be no tragedy if she forgets her passphrase):" The problem I see is that this kind of statements (transmitting implicitely that System Manager is a male and his girlfriend is stupid) can give really negative image of freeBSD community, also it is possible that female users feel ofended and withdraw from using this OS. As a female user of free software, I have to say that being treated without prejudices is rare in IT communities, integration is difficult and surely this kind of behaviour does not help. >How-To-Repeat: man geli >Fix: 1# Create an encrypted provider, but use two keys: one for your partner and one for you (so there will be no tragedy if he/she forgets his/her passphrase): 2# Create an encrypted provider, but use two keys: one for your partner and one for you (so there will be no tragedy if the partner forgets his/her passphrase): >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: