From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 8 13:47:19 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA07454 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jul 1996 13:47:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA07448 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 1996 13:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id PAA23180; Mon, 8 Jul 1996 15:46:23 -0500 From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199607082046.PAA23180@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Subject: Re: CD distribution layout vs FTP distribution layout. To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 15:46:23 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199607081832.UAA01051@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Jul 8, 96 08:32:21 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > As Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > Any strenuous objections to folding these into one location in -current? > > DO IT! > > The traditional difference has been causing me much grief when > installing via FTP from a CDROM. (It usually required lying about the > dist directory, and providing a separate ``root'' floppy.) > > I'd also like to see FTP installations using the given path as > absolute (as opposed to $HOME-relative) if it starts with a slash, but > that's of course way too late for 2.1.5. Why, you don't like specifying a URL of ftp://ftp/../../../../../../../some/path/name? (my AMD setup causes AMD to translate to a temporary pathname 7 elements long)... I'm tired of this too :-) ... JG