Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:31:35 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why delete KDE3 ports? Message-ID: <1357770695540-5776226.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BtpaK203AhSJpSmoqgZCcwDZ5HOCS9xDUkSHV5h0Pxcto8VYw@mail.gmail.com> References: <50EADA33.9010308@aldan.algebra.com> <50EB16B2.4070502@FreeBSD.org> <50EB1991.8010400@marino.st> <CA%2BtpaK1t4TUPeAZATVPO=KZPdwk4aksMDGeWxiMP7HCLcM8S_g@mail.gmail.com> <87txqro2jw.fsf@FreeBSD.org> <50EC8004.4020106@marino.st> <87mwwjnuws.fsf@FreeBSD.org> <1357689775652-5775952.post@n5.nabble.com> <50ED799F.5060102@aldan.algebra.com> <CA%2BtpaK203AhSJpSmoqgZCcwDZ5HOCS9xDUkSHV5h0Pxcto8VYw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I was thinking of December patches. Till now, each time kde3 broke, in few weeks someone would sent patch. > A few clicks leads to nice UI experience with roughly the same > amount of overheard as the 3.x I simply do not believe that. Stripped (!) KDE3 is workable on PIII system, to think the same of KDE4 with much heavier Qt and default configuration would be really stretching plausibility... In the end, I do not care enough (or even like KDE) to support KDE3, but I understand some of the concerns, as I was supporting one KDE3 system, where I wouldn't even try to change to KDE4. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-delete-KDE3-ports-tp5775510p5776226.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1357770695540-5776226.post>