From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Apr 6 15:09:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA21160 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 15:09:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA21154 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 15:09:25 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA28541; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 16:02:09 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199604062302.QAA28541@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: BSDI binaries To: shyone@constantchange.on.ca (Engineer, 08.ZIYA) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 16:02:09 -0700 (MST) Cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, terry@lambert.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Engineer, 08.ZIYA" at Apr 6, 96 03:47:50 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > > I was wondering if it was possible to run the BSDI netscape commercial > > > > server binary on FreeBSD... and if so, how? > > > > > > 1) Run -current > > > > 1a) run -stable. Particularly recommended for production work. Peter > > made special effort to get this support into -stable, IIRC. > > How much difference? I mean, like, i'm running Current (current as of > midnight two days ago, at least). I haven't tried running it yet 'cause i > just got up... will do in a bit after my stuff stops compiling. > > If it turns out good enough, i'll build another machine just for it and > run stable on it... I believe there is a problem with -stable and BSDI 2.0 binaries which are not statically linked. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.