From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 5 14:42:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9067616A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:42:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C07743D1D for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:42:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i95EfuCU014050; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 08:41:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4162B28B.2080007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:41:15 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040831 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryan Freeman References: <4160259A.3070708@FreeBSD.org> <200410041853.12931.krinklyfig@spymac.com> <200410050525.49410.benlutz@datacomm.ch> <200410042220.06970.krinklyfig@spymac.com> <20041005073616.GA77703@slipgate.org> In-Reply-To: <20041005073616.GA77703@slipgate.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3-BETA7 available X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 14:42:16 -0000 Ryan Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:20:06PM -0700, Joshua Tinnin wrote: > >>On Monday 04 October 2004 08:25 pm, Benjamin Lutz >>wrote: >> >>>>I remember reading some posts about this a little while back. Is >>>>there any way to do this with a fine-tooth comb approach, or is it >>>>just about the same to do a portupgrade -af? >>> >>>On my system, about half the installed ports needed rebuilding. I >>>wrote a Python script that lists these ports, you can use it if you >>>like: >>> >>>http://www.maxlor.com/freebsd/files/findlibusers.py >> >>Thank you very much for that. After running I find it's about the same >>for me, but all the really big ones need to be rebuilt. Ah well, but I >>will have to hold off on updating until I have a spare day to rebuild >>everything essential. >> > > > I was just wondering who here uses the nvidia drivers, and if they work on the > library version bumped beta7 or not...a friend of mine updated to beta7... > and while he says he can play quake3 fine, quake2forge (native from ports) > seems to fail with both glx and sdlgl renderers. My thought on this is that, > while the library versions have been bumped, the nvidia drivers for linux > emulation are unaffected, hence the working quake3, but libGL for native > stuff still refers to libm. Is he just having odd system problems beyond > the library version bump? Or am I actually correct in speculating that the > nvidia drivers need to be updated to properly support beta7 and future releases? > > On a final note I have yet to go from beta6 to beta7 in fear that some of my > beloved games will stop working ;) > > - Ryan Freeman Try using /etc/libmap.conf to map the old libraries to the new ones. Scott