From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 08:40:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D79916A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:40:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sarajevo.pacific.net.sg (sarajevo.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E598643D1F for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:40:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 25123 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2004 08:39:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maxwell2.pacific.net.sg) (203.120.90.192) by sarajevo with SMTP; 1 Jul 2004 08:39:51 -0000 Received: from pacific.net.sg ([210.24.202.160]) by maxwell2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20040701083951.ZSLE1183.maxwell2.pacific.net.sg@pacific.net.sg>; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:39:51 +0800 Message-ID: <40E3CDC8.7040603@pacific.net.sg> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:39:36 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040409 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <200407010302.59688.linimon@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <200407010302.59688.linimon@lonesome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-www@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CFD: divide up the 'Hardware compatibility' chapter in the FAQ X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 08:40:25 -0000 Hi, I like. It makes it easier for the beginner. Mark Linimon wrote: > As it stands today, there are 32 entries on this page (I just added the > 32nd, it may not be on the website yet). I would like to propose > breaking this up into several smaller sections. > > The questions are in random order, AFAICT :-), and my prototype does > not yet attempt to deal with that problem. It is only there for a proof- > of-concept glance: This would make it even more usefull for beginners. Erich