Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 18 Aug 2001 01:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
To:        Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Amit Shah <amitshah@techie.com>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: threaded device drivers 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108180115380.53463-100000@beppo>
In-Reply-To: <200108180808.f7I88mJ08635@mass.dis.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> 
> In -current, drivers that want threads can spawn them off; where it's 
> absolutely necessary it's usually a driver-specific issue rather than 
> being something that could be implemented in any more generic a fashion.
> 

An example of this is the QLogic driver (isp(4)) spawns a thread that is used
to rebuild loop state and rescan the loop and fabric port databases after an
asynchronous event brings a notification of change.

Threads are not nearly lightweight enough yet to provide, say, offlevel
processing such as RSX-11 or VMS provided.

-matt



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0108180115380.53463-100000>