Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 22:15:22 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 218917] [ezjail patch] for depreciated legacy rc.conf method support being dropped. Message-ID: <bug-218917-13-bScNp2fiZ6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-218917-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-218917-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218917 Joe Barbish <qjail1@a1poweruser.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |Works As Intended Status|New |Closed --- Comment #4 from Joe Barbish <qjail1@a1poweruser.com> --- Being from the Philippines, new to FreeBSD and forking a port for the first time, I being a member of the original team who forked eajail, we were all unaware of the UN-documented rules about giving attribution to the original author of the port being forked. We just did not know that leaving it out w= as wrong. The team and I have repeatable proclaimed our error to you and the FreeBSD community and proceeded to give acknowledgment to you as the author= of the forked port very prominently at the start of the qjail script and in the man pages. Now I see the style of script logic descriptive comments used in qjail has = made its way into the ezjail-admin script and the man pages have even taken on t= he qjail use of descriptive detailing previous lacking in the ezjail man pages= . I take comfort in the knowledge that who ever submitted the patch making those changes realized their benefits after reviewing the qjail script and man pa= ges. I know this happened and don't care. I am bigger than that.=20=20=20=20=20 I have put this old history behind me and now I try to give back in some sm= all way to help you out and you throw this old history back in my face. You are the one who has not let bygones be bygones by bring this up again. Your action makes me very sorry that I ever tried to help you out. I don't = need this aggravation. Life is to short for this kind of petty drama.=20 You do realize that warning message is driving new ezjail users to search f= or alternate jail tools before committing to using ezjail. You have been around long enough to know you can use that OS jail script by adding attribution and referencing the BSD license.=20 Enough is enough. I am closing this PR. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-218917-13-bScNp2fiZ6>