From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Wed Oct 21 05:40:41 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B00A1ABB4
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 05:40:41 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A82FBDC9
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 05:40:41 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t9L5efGV076551
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 05:40:41 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 203909] [MAINTAINER] devel/sope: Add CFLAGS supressing compiler
 warnings
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 05:40:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, needs-patch, needs-qa, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: pi@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-203909-13-3Edv9ZrMnf@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-203909-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-203909-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 05:40:41 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203909

--- Comment #5 from Kurt Jaeger <pi@FreeBSD.org> ---
About this: If it's not strictly necessary, causing impact, or providing
additional value, consider upstreaming first by default.

David provided his patches to Euan because he assumes that running the
application
without them might have security implications.

With a complex application like this it is a useful workflow to have
it in the tree, then patch it up to some level, then upstream, so that
operational experience can be gained in parallel to bringing it to some
'perfecter' shape. Nothing will ever be 'perfect', anyway 8-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.