Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:02:27 -0800
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Cc:        FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 10.0-RC1: bad mbuf leak?
Message-ID:  <CAJ-Vmo=D%2BTq4SNJsEK5a4Aw9as34m31hutU%2BwQ1GqqaD2a3zVg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <FB1A916C-7ABA-4FFD-A79A-CF757E83F6E8@lurchi.franken.de>
References:  <1387204500.12061.60192349.19EAE1B4@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAJ-VmonGE2=vmFOnCtLVLyNp0=F%2BNUd6OdU6=rROH_PWkyXSDA@mail.gmail.com> <FB1A916C-7ABA-4FFD-A79A-CF757E83F6E8@lurchi.franken.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 December 2013 01:09, Michael Tuexen
<Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> Hm, try reverting just the em code to that from a 10.0-BETA? Just in
>> case something changed there?
> I saw a similar behaviour without the patches we are discussing (regarding
> ignoring the error).

Hm. Why was that?


-a



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=D%2BTq4SNJsEK5a4Aw9as34m31hutU%2BwQ1GqqaD2a3zVg>