Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:13:33 +0000 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.org> To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: stable kqueue locking up and running on SMP Message-ID: <20040421091333.GA4518@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200404210439.i3L4dqJg023358@green.homeunix.org> References: <200404210439.i3L4dqJg023358@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 12:39:52AM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > what is expected. The only missing feature is the ill-conceived NOTE_TRACK. > I do not think that returning for that one note type EINVAL is a deal-breaker > when trying to make kqueue not suck for 5.3; it is far more useful as a > novelty than utility, especially considering I've never seen mention of it > in actual software that uses kqueue. There are no interesting references to it in Google - the only indication that anybody has ever used it is a bugfix: https://citadelle.intrinsec.com/mailing/current/HTML/ml_openbsd-bugs/1801.html Eivind.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040421091333.GA4518>