From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jun 13 14:00:02 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA12951 for current-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jun 1995 14:00:02 -0700 Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id NAA12935 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 1995 13:59:58 -0700 Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1) id AA16260; Tue, 13 Jun 95 14:51:45 MDT From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Message-Id: <9506132051.AA16260@cs.weber.edu> Subject: Re: Which CTM# == 2.0.5R? To: jmb@kryten.atinc.com (Jonathan M. Bresler) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 95 14:51:45 MDT Cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Jonathan M. Bresler" at Jun 13, 95 04:04:21 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52] Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > Honestly, I was getting "OK" response times before, "Good" response > > times after the list sort, and now I get a mix of "Great", "Good", > > "OK", "Bad", and "Absolutely Abysmal" since the list split. > > each list has mixed response times, or a mix when comparing the lists? A mix when comparing lists. Which would account for Rod seeing a question, posting an answer, and having someone else who has seen only the question (or neither the question or the answer) posting the same question, with Rod seeing the second one after the first by dint of the original posting that caused the question to be asked having been crossposted. Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.