Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Jun 1999 00:53:42 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Mike Pritchard <mpp@mpp.pro-ns.net>
To:        jesus.monroy@usa.net (Jesus Monroy)
Cc:        doc@FreeBSD.ORG, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Survey: online documentation 15% incorrect
Message-ID:  <199906240553.AAA14021@mpp.pro-ns.net>
In-Reply-To: <19990623133428.22679.qmail@nwcst323.netaddress.usa.net> from Jesus Monroy at "Jun 23, 1999 06:34:28 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Document: Documentation errors in FreeBSD
> Run Date: 6/17/99
> Description:  The following is a listing of incomplete, ambigous or
>               failed references for FreeBSD using whatit(1) and man(1).
>               This survey was conducted using FreeBSD 3.1.
> 
> A complete Listing can be found at:
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Hub/8031/psuedo-indicators/fbsdutils.html
> 
> Score:
> directory    no reference  ambigous reference  other  total  available
> /bin                    0                   1      1      2         32
> /sbin                   8                   5      0     13         82
> /usr/bin               42                  33      0     75        394
> /usr/sbin               8                   7      2     17        183
>                                                        ----       ----
>                                           total total   107        691
> 
>                                Final Score  107.0/691.0 = 0.1548 (15.5%)

I took a look through this list and by my count only about 55 of
the references are bogus or incorrect or ambiguous. A number of them in 
your list are producing exactly what they should be.  Some others
have been fixed in -current already.

There are a handful of man pages with links to other man pages that do
not show the links in the NAME/SYSNOPSIS section.  I'm going to go fix
the easy ones right now.

A number of man pages/commands are links for historical names for commands,
which have been replaced by new/GNU replacements and the man pages reflect
the updated versions, not the historical name for the command.  These 
should probably be fixed, too.  'man cc' is a good example.  You get
what you need - the gcc man page.  I've never been sure what we should 
do with these.

One interesting problem your survery points out is that whatis/makewhatis
get confused about inetd.conf and inetd.  It lists them both as section
5 man pages, when only inetd is section 8.  This is because
the inetd Makefile MLINKS inetd.8 to inetd.conf.5.  There are
probably a few other commands that might be doing this.  I'll have
to look at this closer.  

Then there are the commands without manual pages, which is just plain
wrong.
-- 
Mike Pritchard
mpp@FreeBSD.ORG or mpp@mpp.pro-ns.net


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906240553.AAA14021>