Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:32:52 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>, Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r346114 - head/devel/p4.el Message-ID: <f8e85ff21f349babc099b00d8207a8b2@apnoea.adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <20140310072423.GC11693@FreeBSD.org> References: <201402260657.s1Q6vEsH059562@svn.freebsd.org> <BEE32AF42CDC7ED09B7234F0@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20140226123420.f5c0d0ff40b404a70334da4b@FreeBSD.org> <20140310072423.GC11693@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2014/03/10 03:24, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:34:20PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote: >> Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> > Taking one amongst many, the current practice is to mute the MKDIR >> > and not mute commands that install files. Would you mind respecting >> > that in the future ? > >> This is just a matter of opinion. I've always preferred to see what is >> being installed or what direcories are being created. Even the example >> in the PHB doesn't mute the mkdir. Unless this gets correcte in the >> PHB >> I won't change this. Alexey - You make this request every few days, it seems, and the response is always the same: it's not in the PHB. You should put it there. It SHOULD be policy. We should strive for consistency across ports. The ports tree should present a unified experience for all ports, for all users. # Adam --- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f8e85ff21f349babc099b00d8207a8b2>