From owner-cvs-ports  Tue Jun  3 14:06:35 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA22718
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 14:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (ppp-206-170-5-142.rdcy01.pacbell.net [206.170.5.142])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA22709;
          Tue, 3 Jun 1997 14:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shockwave.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA01032; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 14:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706032106.OAA01032@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <max@wide.ad.jp>
cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/imap-uw Makefile ports/mail/imap-uw/filesmd5 ports/mail/imap-uw/patches patch-ab patch-aaports/mail/imap-uw/pkg PLIST ports/mail/imap-uw/scripts configure 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Jun 1997 03:22:55 +0900."
             <199706031822.DAA29918@bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp> 
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 14:06:04 -0700
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Max,

The original developer is a relatively sane human being (well, he's not, but
he has some sanity when it comes to coding...)

There is no way in hell that he will mess up his pretty and portable makefiles
with our shared library kludges.

Paul

  From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <max@wide.ad.jp>
  Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/imap-uw Makefile ports/mail/imap-uw/files
>>md5
	   ports/mail/imap-uw/patches patch-ab patch-aaports/mail/imap-uw/pkg
	   PLIST ports/mail/imap-uw/scripts configure
       >   I'm really really really unhappy about these shared library
       > patches.  This code changes WAY too fast to screw with shared
       > libraries.  If they cause massive breakage again, they're
       > history.
    
  Up until this commit, we were adding a target to Makefile ``fbd'' for
  FreeBSD although there *was* a target for FreeBSD already as ``bsf''.
  I guess this was making it difficult for the original developers to
  integrate the changes we've been making (if they've ever tried to do
  that).
  
  What we should do, I think, is to submit our changes to the original
  developer at UW once we patch up the DISTFILES and enable building the
  shared libraries with ``make bsf''.
  
       Cheers,
  Max