From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 9 19:31:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5439D4F for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 19:31:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF6D91BB1 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 19:31:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t59JVoMK008183 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 19:31:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 200712] log spamming i915 since recent MFC to stable/10 Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:31:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: riggs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:31:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200712 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Zander --- (In reply to Jean-Sebastien Pedron from comment #2) Hi, thanks for picking up the ball. I am running stable on this machine, not head as your commit link refers to. I believe you are right in that the flooding started after the new driver was MFCed. A quick search through the older driver sources indicates that the "Power management discrepancy" message didn't even exist prior to that commit. I am not 100% sure, though, whether it went so excessive after r280369 or r282199. If the latter did not change anything in buffer pinning ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.