From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Oct 12 18:39:46 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA05472
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 18:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from meowy.angio.net (meowy.angio.net [206.197.119.31])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA05467
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 18:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from angio@meowy.angio.net)
Received: from meowy.angio.net (localhost.angio.net [127.0.0.1]) by meowy.angio.net (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA17288; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 19:39:24 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199710130139.TAA17288@meowy.angio.net>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: possible sc0 problem 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 12 Oct 1997 10:37:45 PDT."
             <3379.876677865@time.cdrom.com> 
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 19:39:24 -0600
From: Dave Andersen <angio@angio.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


> Now if you want to argue this from a *precedent* vs POLA perspective
> then I'll give LALT full marks for precedence.  If a compromise could
> be reached which would leave this as META for us emacs users (and
> trust me, LALT is *the* key we need it to be - nothing else is
> situated as well on the keyboard as a modifier) let still act the same
> when mated with a function key, I'd be all for it.

   Have we just stumbled upon the perfect remapping of the
FreeBSD-logo key?  (Er, the one that some people in washington
prefer to incorrectly think of as a start-menu key)?

   :)

   -Dave