Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:44:50 -0700 From: "Cliff L. Biffle" <cbiffle@safety.net> To: "Adrian" <adrian@nu-earth.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 1Jan 70 -- FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE + Current Message-ID: <200304231644.50685.cbiffle@safety.net> In-Reply-To: <DCECJGCCEMJIDCEAHBEEIEOHCBAA.adrian@nu-earth.net> References: <DCECJGCCEMJIDCEAHBEEIEOHCBAA.adrian@nu-earth.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 23 April 2003 03:54 pm, Adrian wrote: > EEK, Hi All > i'm not quite sure what to make of this but has anyone seen anything > similar, as its a bit of a worry. I have enclosed the following from > 5.0-Release after having the same prob with 5.0-CURRENT-20030418 prior to > this the server was running 4.5-Release-p2 and it was ok. I get the 1Jan70 process ages as well. While a bit unusual, I don't believe it's problematic; all the processes with that date are kernel-related or low-level system processes. 1Jan70 just means their start dates are zero. This strikes me as a bug, yes, but probably not fatal. :-) -Cliff L. Biffle
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304231644.50685.cbiffle>