From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Nov 17 10:39:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pike.osd.bsdi.com (pike.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E882237B479 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:39:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (john@jhb-laptop.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.241]) by pike.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id eAHIcDB96771; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:38:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:38:55 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin To: Blaz Zupan Subject: Re: 4.2-BETA hangs on boot Cc: Steve Price , Panagiotis Astithas , stable@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 17-Nov-00 Blaz Zupan wrote: > On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, John Baldwin wrote: >> > Ok, then it is the same as leaving the "irq" part out alltogether. >> >> Not entirely. IRQ 0 is actually the clock. I think it is there to allow >> you >> to edit the IRQ during the kernel config to set it to IRQ 10 if you need to. > > Ok, so could this be the problem? I've been removing the "irq" part on the > pccard line on all our boxes (and we have about 100 installations) and never > had a problem with it. I've never tried setting it to "irq 0". Removing it should be fine. I think it is more of a hack to allow an irq setting to be there for the kernel config to pick up on and let the user edit. :) -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message