From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org  Tue Jun  6 21:50:39 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A70BF583E
 for <freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue,  6 Jun 2017 21:50:39 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F1C87C58A
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  6 Jun 2017 21:50:39 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v56Lodvf011614
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 21:50:39 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 219815] ipfw stops working when more than one tables is used
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 21:50:39 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: ecsd@transbay.net
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-219815-8-pZZawye4il@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-219815-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-219815-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 21:50:39 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219815

--- Comment #4 from ecsd@transbay.net ---
I understand perfectly what you are saying. You are simply mistaken. I know
exactly what sort traffic I expect. The source is high volume, and while of=
 a
stochastic nature as regards source address, very predictable (e.g. People's
Republic of China generates so many hits per hour.) The rule sits there wai=
ting
for any such traffic. The rules are simply not firing. I am reporting a bug=
. It
is a BUG, not an error in user observation or understanding. I am waiting to
hear if anyone has experienced anything similar or if anyone can suggest
something to try within the kernel to change the behavior (ie. make it stop
malfunctioning.)

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=