From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 21 23:02:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABEF1065670; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:02:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nitroboost@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3328FC0A; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eeke52 with SMTP id e52so125177eek.13 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:02:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=F9LtYPf+l75JYxwfAYhRGSY3yXIPw2ogeKaHr4Ftum8=; b=wsYUjxSI1/fcxcLA9QPct4lm0t01/cNvsl7jl+gZFDQ8g+56d7FVJrAmfUY/hgi84m vuL+wpEoumveln0kT906bxQ1ov+CDvmOdFrIlqVb6ruTLNqhfOhOywA1iw/fdd17fdE/ HxP3AvNWRorKRb+45gdSmKNKiGZlpqydSCcoBDZ5/T1t4cSK+a8/BHuv31MwKSkvoTM1 oDc4NDW3Hig6LI8bVr1EbfzyhwoT7msVX6NO5S8zuSxsjG26ccxOv83g7JJqsQ4G62YY GKBVg6codxNOcQnP1fD/atZAwMWlAtT1WQI0uzGkhGZRO34dO2RVwPQFOqbyiJoxd+Ek UKsw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.203.70 with SMTP id e46mr15944544eeo.2.1345590150636; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.183.132 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:02:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1345213426.53058.YahooMailClassic@web121603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1345213426.53058.YahooMailClassic@web121603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:02:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: Jason Wolfe To: Barney Cordoba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Konstantin Belousov , jfv@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel , John Baldwin , net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 82574L hangs (with r233708 e1000 driver). X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:02:32 -0000 On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Barney Cordoba wrote: > > --- On Thu, 8/9/12, Jason Wolfe wrote: >> >> Ever since r235553 the 82574L has been stable for me, >> collectively >> passing ~1.2Tb/s for the past 4 months without issue. >> We did have >> some issues with switches not liking the fallout of what >> r236162 fixed >> that we updated to, but the cards themselves were >> fine. If you pull >> the current e1000 from 8-STABLE you'll get up to r236162. >> >> Jason > > Do you get occasional watchdog reset messages? I'm trying to see if > the buffer jumping problem has been fixed or if they just put a condition > watch in to keep it from remaining hung. > > Is Jack confident that something substantive has been corrected? If so, > what was the culprit? I have to patch it into a 7.x driver. > > Barney Barney, I've not seen any watchdog errors, and they have been performing pretty flawlessly even with the NIC pegged. I believe r235553 was the revision that fixed most of the issues on my end. Jason