Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 12:24:39 -0800 From: Sean Chittenden <sean-freebsd-stable@chittenden.org> To: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl 5.6 merged soon? Message-ID: <20010315122439.A57101@rand.tgd.net> In-Reply-To: <20010315201739.C23970@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>; from "jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org" on Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at = 08:17:39PM References: <20010315080445.A57062@clyde.goodleaf.net> <20010315095551E.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <20010315121201.E54243@rand.tgd.net> <20010315201739.C23970@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Agree with you 110%! At the same time, bleed perl has been out for a while and there has to be a decent list of issues or bugs, or something that could be the base for a list of issues that need to be resolved before it can be merged. I personally, have upgraded to 5.6 in a few circumstances and haven't had any problems that I've noticed (other than needing to recompile mod_perl), but somewhere someone's run across something and hopefully it's been documented (maybe even in the form of a list?). On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 08:17:39PM +0000, j mckitrick wrote: > [...] It just takes time. Can we put some kind of plausible bounds on the time? -sc --=20 Sean Chittenden sean@chittenden.org --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjqxJQcACgkQn09c7x7d+q2NIgCfQCdWhquiAE+MDdGz9JSUoqUw aDEAn2snQpCntsSDcKUF9aI6q0BchMwF =a+pT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010315122439.A57101>