From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 22:28:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35546106566B; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:28:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB388FC1B; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:28:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (pav@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0KMSKuA041091; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:28:20 GMT (envelope-from pav@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0KMSKTN041087; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:28:20 GMT (envelope-from pav) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:28:20 GMT Message-Id: <200901202228.n0KMSKTN041087@freefall.freebsd.org> To: ecrist@secure-computing.net, ecrist@secure-computing.net, pav@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/130754: update to security/ssl-admin X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:28:21 -0000 Synopsis: update to security/ssl-admin State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: pav State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 20 22:25:09 UTC 2009 State-Changed-Why: 1.0.r38 is actually lower version than 1.0 (r stands for RC - release candidate). How will you address this? Also, I don't see any reason not to package this port. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=130754