From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 23 17:19:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3819837B401 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:19:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kientzle.com (h-66-166-149-50.SNVACAID.covad.net [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A49343FCB for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:19:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kientzle@acm.org) Received: from acm.org (ugly.x.kientzle.com [66.166.149.51]) by kientzle.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h3O0I7v34978; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:18:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kientzle@acm.org) Message-ID: <3EA72D85.4030205@acm.org> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:19:17 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011206 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Cliff L. Biffle" References: <200304231644.50685.cbiffle@safety.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Adrian cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 1Jan 70 -- FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE + Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kientzle@acm.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:19:25 -0000 This has been discussed on this list several times: those processes are all started before the kernel has initialized the time. Because FreeBSD has to read the disk before it can know whether the hardware clock is in UTC or local time, it's hard to really do much better than this. (I suppose you could edit 'ps' to display such times as '-'; that might be less misleading.) Tim Kientzle Cliff L. Biffle wrote: > On Wednesday 23 April 2003 03:54 pm, Adrian wrote: > >>EEK, Hi All >>i'm not quite sure what to make of this but has anyone seen anything >>similar, as its a bit of a worry. I have enclosed the following from >>5.0-Release after having the same prob with 5.0-CURRENT-20030418 prior to >>this the server was running 4.5-Release-p2 and it was ok. >> > > I get the 1Jan70 process ages as well. While a bit unusual, I don't believe > it's problematic; all the processes with that date are kernel-related or > low-level system processes. 1Jan70 just means their start dates are zero. > > This strikes me as a bug, yes, but probably not fatal. :-) > > -Cliff L. Biffle > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >