From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 23 17:19:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830B116A400 for ; Wed, 23 May 2007 17:19:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B33013C480 for ; Wed, 23 May 2007 17:19:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA81519A4 for ; Wed, 23 May 2007 13:19:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:19:43 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070523181943.1a97605c@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20070524002531.3cd65668@localhost> References: <46529E35.7080401@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20070523031505.3071bc9b@gumby.homeunix.com.> <4653F303.2000302@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20070524002531.3cd65668@localhost> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: "portmanager -s" deletes ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:19:47 -0000 On Thu, 24 May 2007 00:25:31 +1000 Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2007 09:53:39 +0200 > Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > > > This is weird! A program that is supposed to show the *status* of > > installed ports should never arbitrarily *remove* ports. > > I agree that is not clear why it is removing ports without warning. Well, we don't actually know that. I suspect that there was a warning, but it went to stdout and was eaten by "|grep OLD". Portmanger then waited for a y/n response for 5 minutes, and went with the default of deleting the port.