Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 3 May 1997 23:44:43 +0200
From:      j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
To:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        are@communique.no (Are Bryne)
Subject:   Re: Why isn't manpath(1) used? (fwd)
Message-ID:  <19970503234443.NP21366@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970503183649.4740A-100000@rune.communique.no>; from Are Bryne on May 3, 1997 18:39:09 %2B0200
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.970503183649.4740A-100000@rune.communique.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Are Bryne wrote:

> I received no answers on this from -questions, so I try here.

I don't think you will get many answers though.  I cannot remember any
discussion about it, so it's probably not used since it was not used
to be used. :-)

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970503234443.NP21366>