From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 15 4:58:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.dk (fw-rl0.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4482937B405; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 04:58:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sos@localhost) by freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3FBvB941309; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 13:57:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <200204151157.g3FBvB941309@freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: ATA errors on recent -current In-Reply-To: <3CBABCC4.17211012@mindspring.com> To: Terry Lambert Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 13:57:10 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , Alexander Leidinger , dwcjr@inethouston.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG, sos@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: sos@freebsd.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems Terry Lambert wrote: > "Søren Schmidt" wrote: > > > Is your drive perchance an IBM DTLA? > > > > > > It's known to have these problems. > > > > Cool! would you like to share where that information is available so > > I can possibly work around the problem ?? > > IBM DTLA drives are known to be problematic. If you use that > in a search engine, it will find numerous references to the > drive electronics being too slow for sustained access to the > sectors closes to the spindle. This thread is about tagged queueing problems on IBM drives since they are the only ones that supports it, it is not specific to the DTLA series at all, which this thread has already explained. So Terry, do you have anything to share, or just noise like this ? (I dont care about if the DTLA may have other problems) -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message