From owner-freebsd-python@freebsd.org Thu Oct 22 21:00:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC4E42B24B for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:00:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHKXC3n5lz4WBT for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:00:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 81B2642B249; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: python@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817CD42B248 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:00:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHKXC2wWMz4Vvw for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:00:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4503B1CAE2 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:00:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09ML0xer063703 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:00:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09ML0xav063702 for python@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:00:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208561] [NEW PORT] sysutils/datadog: Datadog Cloud-Scale Monitoring agent Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:00:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: dch@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dch@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:00:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208561 --- Comment #14 from Dave Cottlehuber --- thanks uros for the work here! Other than a few tidy-ups this is a fantastic port. I'm tweaking it for v7 & USES=3Dgo:modules but other than that LGTM. on v7, there's 1 (docker related) dependency that doesn't fetch correctly; help wanted on figuring out how to manage that. Is it sufficient to remove = the line from modules, and the invoke ... command parameters? https://git.sr.ht/~dch/ports/tree/feature/datadog I'll add a patch tomorrow from this branch after some further work. Assuming that works, it needs to respect hier(7) to land in ports. Hopefully we can do th= is with some gentle patches in the source. assuming /usr/local/bin/dd-agent or similar, does it make more sense to use /var/run/datadog/... or /var/db/datadog/... for example for its runtime fil= es? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=