Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 11:08:20 -0400 From: Dave Alderman <dave@persprog.com> To: Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk> Cc: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? Message-ID: <334D0264.BAD92424@persprog.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970410153351.23602K-100000@bagpuss.visint.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stephen Roome wrote: > > Obviously getting a board that supports more cacheable memory is a good > idea, but assuming memory prices continue to drop then by the time I want > another 64MB of memory in both machines I should be able to get two new > (even better) motherboards as well for the same price as I would pay for > that 64MB now.. Well, that's all opinion, but it seems to make sense to > me. (Which means that it's probably wrong !) > > Steve Roome (underfunded) Your logic makes sense to me. I must claim some bias in this affair since I hate to be forced to do anything (like buy a motherboard that deliberately restricts your memory usage). -- It's not my fault! It's some guy named "General Protection"! --Ratbert David W. Alderman dave@persprog.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?334D0264.BAD92424>