From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 1 02:34:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DB816A420 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 02:34:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9408843D48 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 02:34:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i28so56967wra for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:34:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=tQwJ3y9QccRoxZU+OqjtFHONOpcg4R9TTr1S5ruBumCOZNh/8m9HbliFw8L4VZOkcO96viJFMpXthOx0vm5MnelCNtg6yXGy0Z0Sr08sBXaeR3K6HOh8W4e8nplwnuJBbNNN3obo4EEaQ0/2+VYxDf3uKhqDjaKWgkuQcLTqPSo= Received: by 10.54.111.19 with SMTP id j19mr3658494wrc; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:34:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.76? ( [221.186.3.89]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 28sm457132wrl.2006.01.31.18.33.57; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:33:59 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Kjeldergaard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:33:42 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <93676E29-4F0E-40DC-904C-225A859D0B78@u.washington.edu> <200602010156.57750.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: <200602010156.57750.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2214806.sXrqPAjznh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602011133.53031.kjelderg@gmail.com> Cc: RW Subject: Re: Standard way of updating 6.x ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:34:06 -0000 --nextPart2214806.sXrqPAjznh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Wednesday 01 February 2006 10:56=E3=80=81RW =E3=81=95=E3=82=93=E3=81=AF=E6= =9B=B8=E3=81=8D=E3=81=BE=E3=81=97=E3=81=9F: > On Tuesday 31 January 2006 17:45, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Xn Nooby wrote: > > > > portupgrade: Use for updating your actual ports programs. > > > > There may be a more elegant solution though and I would be more than > > happy to hear it too :). > > -Garrett > > I find that portmanager generally does a better job at keeping ports up to > date without manual intervention. A notable example being its ability to > upgrade Gnome without the help of a script. I also found portupgrade both more capable in many cases and more easy-to-u= se=20 (just portmanager -u to do what one "usually" wants to do). Too bad it was= =20 pulled from ports. =2D-=20 Emails appear more personalised with signatures. --nextPart2214806.sXrqPAjznh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD4B4QSMnO3Fce5JgRArJbAJ4iOCEudWmKRVwqpSgFXLbYsQOuGQCfezJO BXDQzAPhpcG6JqkBFSYqU0U= =qmG0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2214806.sXrqPAjznh--