From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Aug 26 11:39:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (c421509-a.pinol1.sfba.home.com [24.7.86.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EF537B409 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 11:39:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from elischer.org (InterJet.elischer.org [192.168.1.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA69261; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 11:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B89408C.54CCB390@elischer.org> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 11:31:40 -0700 From: Julian Elischer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Eischen Cc: "bsd-api-discuss@wasabisystems.com" Subject: Re: changes to BSD APIs for THREADS support References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Daniel Eischen wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > On that front FreeBSD is looking at at least 4 new syscalls. > > I'm going to describe them by function rather than name as the names are > > not decided: > > How do we create and destroy new KSE Groups? Is that just an option > to creating a new KSE? yes > > I assume we'll also eventually have a method of [sg]etting the priority > and scheduling class of a KSE Group. My current thought on that is that the current process priority calls, when applied to the current process will apply to the calling ksegrp.., > > -- > Dan Eischen -- +------------------------------------+ ______ _ __ | __--_|\ Julian Elischer | \ U \/ / hard at work in | / \ julian@elischer.org +------>x USA \ a very strange | ( OZ ) \___ ___ | country ! +- X_.---._/ presently in San Francisco \_/ \\ v To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message