From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Thu Oct 8 10:56:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991579D2AC0 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:56:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ya.shreekantha@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2873918BD for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:56:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ya.shreekantha@gmail.com) Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so19972710wic.0 for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 03:56:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MQ04oHVLD+2pinAkOInamUUPQYSjg10du6w0i8iRERM=; b=tQUrIqcjfWVV7Gq2OxpFFr6kKmpfgGcDvMbiMrq3umN1fdzIz1ge/t1uwl/dYlHc/C A+B3gIEGYASKOg+LSNlWZBq+AK658/8lOc7ryB2u58VDhLnQxwmjGxgK3eDitXmI8sNW jo9hO5rkjJWQFHJpetVlT+m85r9ESchvBsby++6lfJ/+hO96ON1/s3t9mMuex0PEpfjN dJD+YxrDX9vMjOyZNzJnsMwPUPz7VMzH2v/jOpGMZsJKbfRNGX0/HA1oc9KpyklXTqU7 TXTDkODb4wXmr5qwuNDqIbAaz/c6MDjA4XlxCPaSsWYL5s/nZ5DAmmdTx2f9tIvTij/l 4tDg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.86.231 with SMTP id s7mr3124732wiz.15.1444301804164; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 03:56:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.126.87 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 03:56:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5613E462.9050000@citrix.com> References: <1444141541780-6043366.post@n5.nabble.com> <5613E462.9050000@citrix.com> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 16:26:44 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Need help : 10.2 + Xen dom0 support From: Shree Kantha To: =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:56:46 -0000 Thanks a lot Roger for this information. I am able to progress with this. I took below commits of you to stable 10.2= : - rS280954: multiboot: fix error codes - Diffusion Commit - rS280953: multiboot: zero mod list array - rS277215: loader: implement multiboot support for Xen Dom0 With this, i build kernel, and followed steps mentioned in : http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/FreeBSD_Dom0. when my system reboots, I see below error: "ERROR: Not a Xen-ELF image: No ELF notes or '__xen_ost' section found ***************************************************************************= ******** Panic on CPU 0: Could not set up DOM0 guest OS ***************************************************************************= ******** Can you please tell me if I am missng anything here. Well, I took the above mentioned fix to correct the multiboot support.If there are any other patches to be used, plz let me know. thanks a ton, Shree On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Roger Pau Monn=C3=A9 wrote: > Hello, > > El 06/10/15 a les 16.25, shree ha escrit: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > I am new to FreeBSD. Need your input on how I can get Xen dom0 support = on > > FreeBSD 10.2 release. > > Any reason you cannot use HEAD instead? > > > I went through : > http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/FreeBSD_Dom0#Shortcomings, > > but did not help me get following information: > > (1) Is there a list of patches/code changes that I can pick and apply o= n > > 10.2 to get Xen dom0 support? > > Most of my commits need to be backported in order to have Dom0 support, > but IMHO, I'm not sure how many conflicts you will get when trying to > apply them to stable/10. You can get a list using `svn log --search > royger`. > > > (2) I see in one of the post, build fails. Just wanted to know if there > are > > any other changes required. > > I'm not sure what you mean with this, which build fails? > > Roger. > >