From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 2 22:39:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0146106564A for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 22:39:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Received: from cobra.acceleratedweb.net (cobra-gw.acceleratedweb.net [207.99.79.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 619438FC08 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 22:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27199 invoked by uid 110); 2 Jun 2012 22:32:52 -0000 Received: from ool-4571afe7.dyn.optonline.net (HELO desktop1) (simon@optinet.com@69.113.175.231) by cobra.acceleratedweb.net with SMTP; 2 Jun 2012 22:32:52 -0000 From: "Simon" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 18:32:39 -0400 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2717) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;3) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20120602223934.D0146106564A@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Anyone using freebsd ZFS for large storage servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 22:39:34 -0000 This thread confused me. Is the conclusion of this thread that ZFS is slow and breaks beyond recovery? I keep seeing two sides to this coin. I can't decide whether to use ZFS or hardware RAID. Why does EMC use hardware RAID? -Simon