From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 18:59:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from marvin.shell-server.com (marvin.shell-server.com [216.206.242.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3284C37B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 18:59:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (bsd@localhost) by marvin.shell-server.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e921xDh70447; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:59:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bsd@shell-server.com) X-Authentication-Warning: marvin.shell-server.com: bsd owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:59:13 -0500 (CDT) From: BSD To: Bill Fumerola Cc: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) In-Reply-To: <20001001154131.Y38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > > >cpu I686_CPU # aka Pentium Pro(tm) > > > >options NO_F00F_HACK > > > > > > The F00F problem is only with Pentiums. > > Exactly why I disable the work-around code with NO_F00F_HACK > > option :) > That's like saying "I turn down the scsi probe time" without having any > scsi devices in your kernel. Every time NO_F00F_HACK is used is in conjunction > with I586_CPU. But...the CPU is i686. --Bart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message