Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:59:13 -0500 (CDT)
From:      BSD <bsd@shell-server.com>
To:        Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com>
Cc:        "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.10010012058020.70144-100000@marvin.shell-server.com>
In-Reply-To: <20001001154131.Y38472@jade.chc-chimes.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> > > >cpu             I686_CPU                # aka Pentium Pro(tm)
> > > >options         NO_F00F_HACK
> > > 
> > > The F00F problem is only with Pentiums.
> > 	Exactly why I disable the work-around code with NO_F00F_HACK
> > option :)
> That's like saying "I turn down the scsi probe time" without having any
> scsi devices in your kernel. Every time NO_F00F_HACK is used is in conjunction
> with I586_CPU.

	But...the CPU is i686.

		--Bart




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10010012058020.70144-100000>