Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 14:07:06 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712091355130.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org> In-Reply-To: <20171209015928.GW2827@home.opsec.eu> References: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712091013310.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org> <56f7eaad9cfcc5da32935708d0599a49@udns.ultimatedns.net> <20171209015928.GW2827@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 9 Dec 2017, Kurt Jaeger wrote: [ On removing Sendmail from FreeBSD ] > If sendmail is available via ports, wouldn't that be enough ? It better be in ports (but don't look at me; I have my hands full with my Mac & iPad with possibly an iPhone and an Android thrown in, and two Penguins); I've spent about 30 years with Sendmail and I ain't changing (I looked at Postfix but didn't like it)... -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.21.1712091355130.35694>