From owner-freebsd-java Tue Dec 11 13:45:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from calliope.cs.brandeis.edu (calliope.cs.brandeis.edu [129.64.3.189]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65D537B405 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:45:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (meshko@localhost) by calliope.cs.brandeis.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA03081 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 16:45:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 16:45:23 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Kruk To: Subject: Re: jdk1.3.1p5 In-Reply-To: <15382.32117.633615.124202@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org what are you people arguing about? a) Green threads are not suited for use in plugin. (I know that because that's what Joe says and Nate is not arguing this point) b) Green threads work fine when you use them for running java applications. (I know that because I've been running a thread-intensive application for a month on patchset 5 without any problems, and because Nate says so, and because Joe doesn't argue with that either) So what the hell are you talking about??? I fail to notice any contradicition except in terms (green threads are completely broken vs green threads are not suited for plugin... whatever!) Please stop, you are scaring the children. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message