Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 01:41:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: __fpclassifyd problem Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10310230127410.6338-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20031023041544.068CD2A7EA@canning.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Peter Wemm wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > If it's just __fpclassifyd(), can you just add a compatability > > hack to libm so it works with both libc 4.0 and 5.x? You > > can make __fpclassifyd a weak definition to the hack in libm. > > I suppose you could also add __fpclassfyd() to libc 4.0. > > We tried this at usenix, but it still didn't work. Obviously there is more > going on. I guess so. That's weird because it seems like it should work. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10310230127410.6338-100000>