Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:28:17 +0000 (UTC) From: jb <jb.1234abcd@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why =?utf-8?b?UkVMRU5HXzk=?= branch is labeled as PRERELEASE and freebsd.org says FreeBSD is currently at 9.1-RC2 ? Message-ID: <loom.20121028T202105-792@post.gmane.org> References: <508C7445.6080809@rawbw.com> <20121028151758.5f866bcb@davenulle.org> <508D7DF3.8080103@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yuri <yuri <at> rawbw.com> writes: > > On 10/28/2012 07:17, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > > RELENG_9 should be called 9-STABLE, if you want 9.1 use RELENG_9_1 > > Hm, if they wanted to keep RELENG_9 as "stable" 9.X branch, why then > 9.1-PRERELEASE is there? Is PRERELEASE considered more stable than RC? > This looks strange to me. > > Yuri http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1/sys/conf/newvers.sh?view=log Go back to Revision 227495, read log text, click View and scroll down to see TYPE="FreeBSD" 34 REVISION="9.0" BRANCH="PRERELEASE" Then back off and move the log up by repeating as above. Hopefully you understand his drill :-) jb
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?loom.20121028T202105-792>