From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 21:44:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A8716A4CE; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:44:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C832C43D2F; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:44:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (vs@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i7VLixvs020467; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:44:59 GMT (envelope-from vs@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from vs@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7VLixgL020463; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:44:59 GMT (envelope-from vs) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:44:59 GMT From: Volker Stolz Message-Id: <200408312144.i7VLixgL020463@freefall.freebsd.org> To: port-dump9660@FreeBSD.org, vs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, vs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/71205: Dump9660 port no longer maintained and should be removed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:45:00 -0000 Synopsis: Dump9660 port no longer maintained and should be removed State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: vs State-Changed-When: Tue Aug 31 21:42:44 GMT 2004 State-Changed-Why: Which package (port?) contains now dump9660? Or isn't it yet packaged as a FreeBSD port? If it hasn't been packaged yet, wouldn't it be worth keeping around? Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->vs Responsible-Changed-By: vs Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Aug 31 21:42:44 GMT 2004 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll handle this http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=71205