From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 19 5:53:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [209.98.143.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844C837B5A6 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 05:53:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.com) Received: from bone.nectar.com (bone.nectar.com [10.0.1.105]) by gw.nectar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DDE9B2A; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 07:53:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bone.nectar.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DA79E1DC6; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 07:53:28 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 07:53:28 -0500 From: "Jacques A . Vidrine" To: Francisco Reyes Cc: "FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: -e option to umount? Message-ID: <20000619075328.J3569@bone.nectar.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A . Vidrine" , Francisco Reyes , "FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG" References: <20000618210652.A917@midgard.dhs.org> <200006190354.XAA22495@sanson.reyes.somos.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200006190354.XAA22495@sanson.reyes.somos.net>; from fran@reyes.somos.net on Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 11:54:51PM -0400 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [trimmed cc: list, now including only -current] On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 11:54:51PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Also speaking from my own experience I would have expected > something like this to be part of the system and would have > never even looked for a port. And you'd find it, at least for SCSI devices, in camcontrol(8). e.g. % camcontrol eject cd0 This works for SCSI tapes as well. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message