Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:26:39 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/cfs Message-ID: <201109090026.p890Qd9F078945@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:54:36 %2B0200." <4E68F34C.6090504@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke: > > I want machines, tools, to do as *I* say not the other way round, whether > > it's good for me or not. If I wanted nannying and interference, I'd install > > Ubuntu. > > No, you'd use a managed installation. Nobody stands there pointing a > gun at your head and forces you to uninstall a port that got removed > from the ports/ tree. If people could recognize that, it might help get > the derailed discussion back on the right track. Recent butchery degrading ports/ has been unprofessional. Denying users are best to decide for themselves in light of their own circustance, is not acceptable. FreeBSD is for skilled Users not the clueless. Commit bit[s] should be revoked before FreeBSD incures more damage. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below, not above; Indent with "> "; Cumulative like a play script. Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. http://www.softwarefreedomday.org 17th Sept, http://berklix.org/sfd/ Oct.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201109090026.p890Qd9F078945>