From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 21:29:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2595A19C for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 21:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E68B01C07 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 21:29:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7VLTvJJ034582 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 21:29:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193195] lang/ruby21 deleted lang/ruby19 Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 21:29:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: swills@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 21:29:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193195 --- Comment #4 from Steve Wills --- (In reply to gja822 from comment #3) > Thanks for reply. But I've followed all instructions in ports/UPDATING from > 20130527 and later (and much earlier), so I hadn't expected such behaviour. > I had 1.9 as default for a long time, till AFAIR 20130527 (when I made > ruby=2.1 in make.conf instead of DEFAULT_RUBY_VER=1.9 or smth similar). > After that I had no such problems. (But, I suppose, some other port(s) > ignored that line in make.conf and reinstalled ruby-1.9). If you had: ruby-1.9.3.547,1 and: ruby21-2.1.2,1 installed, ruby 1.9 was your default ruby, not 2.1. If 2.1 was default, you would have had: ruby-2.1.2 and perhaps: ruby19-1.9.3.547,1 The one without the suffix in the name is the default one. > Well, from lang/ruby21 directory first time I made deinstall (which deleted > previously upgraded ruby-1.9 version) and afterwards I couldn't make install > ("ruby-2.1 and ruby21-2.1 conflict" since installing in the same place). > O.K., may be it's not wrong, but some recommendations on changing default > versions or something like that would be useful. When changing the default version, you have to at least reinstall all versions of ruby that are installed. > I've finally pkg delete'd wrong "ruby21" version with dependants and > reinstalled all afterwards manually, so I cannot reproduce any more. Ok, in that case I'm going to be unable to solve this issue, so I propose we close this bug. Thanks for the report, if similar issues come up, I'll take a look. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.