From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 6 13:03:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A03737B401 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7F443F93 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:03:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158])h76K1G3M026141; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 16:01:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.2.1.4] (vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4]) h76K2aOQ043507; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 16:02:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: stan In-Reply-To: <20030806194732.GA28939@teddy.fas.com> References: <20030806194732.GA28939@teddy.fas.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-u9JX7/7Tq1xyEZFRh+ee" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1060200189.723.44.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 16:03:09 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_XIMIAN autolearn=ham version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: Which snmp port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 20:03:15 -0000 --=-u9JX7/7Tq1xyEZFRh+ee Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 15:47, stan wrote: > There seem to be 2 (or 3) ports of UCD snmp in the ports tree, and the > description files don't enlighten me as to the differences. >=20 > Could someone clue me in as to the reasons to use on vs the other? I would use net/net-snmp (net-snmp 5.x) if you plan on using it for real device/system management. It has many new features and improvements over 4.x. I maintain and use net-snmp4 solely for a Perl application I wrote that currently has some problems with the 5.x modules. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-u9JX7/7Tq1xyEZFRh+ee Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/MV79b2iPiv4Uz4cRAuYLAJ46Oi4al9of5FEa45AyfgztMI6exgCeMHsF ngc4CAsMfAhodphIlw/Ucoc= =FDF/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-u9JX7/7Tq1xyEZFRh+ee--