From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 27 22:38:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697AB16A402 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:38:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3977213C48D for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:38:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1RMaFB2065655; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:36:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l1RMaF7m065654; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:36:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:36:15 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: "Peter A. Giessel" Message-ID: <20070227223615.GD65301@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20070227212419.GA65273@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <45E4A753.2020508@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45E4A753.2020508@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux Compat X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:38:47 -0000 On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:49:07PM -0900, Peter A. Giessel wrote: > On 2007/02/27 12:24, Jerry seems to have typed: > > Am I missing something, or is this now just a standard part of > > the base? I rummaged through the Release notes and didn't > > see anything mentioned. > > Did you try the handbook? > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/linuxemu-lbc-install.html Maybe I didn't ask my question well. What I meant to ask is - is this a change that I missed somewhere. I used to get asked during the installation process for a yes/no and I did not see it this time. I think that got some runtime libraries installed along with the linux_enable="YES" plunked in the rc.conf for me. I am aware that I can do it myself later - say I had said no during sysinstall or whatever. Anway, I didn't see it mentioned that this question was removed from sysinstall and I wondered if I missed something - either during the install or in the documentation somewhere. ////jerry