From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Aug 10 19:56:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from voyager.bxscience.edu (voyager.bxscience.edu [167.206.32.174]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6190014E2B for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 19:56:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stuyman@confusion.net) Received: from confusion.net (choates1-bp-57.dartmouth.edu [129.170.46.57]) by voyager.bxscience.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA36942; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:56:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <37B0E554.6410A94@confusion.net> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:52:04 -0400 From: Laurence Berland X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Dominic Mitchell , Joel Sutton , brian@pobox.com, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [ADV] Marketing / Differentiating FreeBSD References: <19990808025724.13926.rocketmail@web1001.mail.yahoo.com> <19990809123221.B1888@voodoo.pandhm.co.uk> <37AEC1C8.3663A849@confusion.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I can't find the url right now, but there was an article on ZDnet a little while back that said they'd let the application lapse or something, and that it wans't registered. If you search ZDnet or /. you should find it. Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Laurence Berland writes: > > don't you mean "Open Source software compatible!" > > Open Source isn't a trademark, a copyright, or anything else that would > > prevent me from claiming the windows 2000 is open source, except perhaps > > a false advertising law suit. > > Open Source is a trademark of the Open Source Initiative. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message